California AB 331 vs Illinois AI Video Interview Act

Compare California and Illinois approaches to regulating AI in employment — scope, requirements, and enforcement differences.

Side-by-Side Comparison

AspectCalifornia AB 331Illinois AIVRA
JurisdictionCaliforniaIllinois
Effective Date2025 (enforcement 2026)2020 (Video Interview Act)
ScopeAll automated decision tools in employmentAI-analyzed video interviews only
PenaltiesCivil penalties, private right of action$500/day per violation
Audit RequirementImpact assessment requiredDemographic reporting required
Key ProvisionRequires impact assessments for all AI employment toolsRequires consent before AI analysis of video interviews

Key Differences

  • California covers all AI employment tools; Illinois focuses specifically on video interviews
  • California requires broader impact assessments; Illinois requires specific consent procedures
  • Illinois has been enforced since 2020; California enforcement is upcoming
  • California may allow private lawsuits; Illinois enforced by state agencies

Compliance Strategy

  1. 1Companies operating in both states need separate compliance procedures
  2. 2Start with Illinois video interview consent as it is actively enforced
  3. 3Prepare California impact assessment framework ahead of enforcement
  4. 4Use OnHirely for bias auditing component of both regulations

Related Pages

Comply With Multiple Regulations at Once

OnHirely supports multi-regulation analysis. Run a single audit and get compliance reports for NYC LL144, EU AI Act, and more.

Start Free Audit