California AB 331 vs Illinois AI Video Interview Act
Compare California and Illinois approaches to regulating AI in employment — scope, requirements, and enforcement differences.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Aspect | California AB 331 | Illinois AIVRA |
|---|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | California | Illinois |
| Effective Date | 2025 (enforcement 2026) | 2020 (Video Interview Act) |
| Scope | All automated decision tools in employment | AI-analyzed video interviews only |
| Penalties | Civil penalties, private right of action | $500/day per violation |
| Audit Requirement | Impact assessment required | Demographic reporting required |
| Key Provision | Requires impact assessments for all AI employment tools | Requires consent before AI analysis of video interviews |
Key Differences
- California covers all AI employment tools; Illinois focuses specifically on video interviews
- California requires broader impact assessments; Illinois requires specific consent procedures
- Illinois has been enforced since 2020; California enforcement is upcoming
- California may allow private lawsuits; Illinois enforced by state agencies
Compliance Strategy
- 1Companies operating in both states need separate compliance procedures
- 2Start with Illinois video interview consent as it is actively enforced
- 3Prepare California impact assessment framework ahead of enforcement
- 4Use OnHirely for bias auditing component of both regulations
Related Pages
NYC Local Law 144 vs. California AB 331
Compare the two most significant US AI hiring regulations: NYC's active Local Law 144 and California's broader AB 331 framework.
Read moreNYC Local Law 144 vs. EU AI Act
Compare the US's most active local AI hiring law with the EU's comprehensive AI regulation framework.
Read moreUS State AI Hiring Laws Comparison
Compare AI hiring regulations across US states: New York, California, Illinois, Maryland, and Colorado.
Read moreEU AI Act vs GDPR: Hiring Implications
How the EU AI Act and GDPR interact for AI-powered hiring tools — compliance requirements, data protection, and enforcement.
Read moreFederal vs State AI Hiring Regulation in the US
Compare federal EEOC guidelines with state-level AI hiring laws — which apply to your company and when.
Read moreColorado AI Act vs Connecticut AI Act
Side-by-side comparison of Colorado and Connecticut approaches to AI regulation in employment.
Read moreEEOC vs OFCCP: AI Hiring Compliance Requirements
Compare EEOC and OFCCP requirements for AI-powered hiring tools — which applies to your company and what you need to do.
Read more2024 vs 2025: What Changed in AI Hiring Regulation
Year-over-year comparison of AI hiring regulations — new laws, enforcement updates, and what to expect next.
Read moreComply With Multiple Regulations at Once
OnHirely supports multi-regulation analysis. Run a single audit and get compliance reports for NYC LL144, EU AI Act, and more.
Start Free Audit