EU AI Act vs GDPR: Hiring Implications

How the EU AI Act and GDPR interact for AI-powered hiring tools — compliance requirements, data protection, and enforcement.

Side-by-Side Comparison

AspectEU AI ActGDPR
JurisdictionEuropean UnionEuropean Union
Effective Date2026 (high-risk provisions)2018
ScopeAI systems used in employment decisionsAll personal data processing
PenaltiesUp to €35M or 7% global turnoverUp to €20M or 4% global turnover
Audit RequirementConformity assessment requiredDPIA required for high-risk processing
Key ProvisionClassifies employment AI as high-risk requiring transparency and human oversightAutomated decision-making subject to Article 22 restrictions

Key Differences

  • GDPR focuses on data protection; AI Act focuses on AI system safety and fairness
  • GDPR Article 22 already restricts fully automated decisions; AI Act adds transparency and oversight requirements
  • Both can apply simultaneously — compliance with one does not satisfy the other
  • Penalties can stack — up to €35M + €20M for simultaneous violations

Compliance Strategy

  1. 1Conduct GDPR DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment together for efficiency
  2. 2Ensure lawful basis for demographic data processing (GDPR) while meeting audit requirements (AI Act)
  3. 3Implement both data protection controls and AI transparency measures
  4. 4OnHirely supports GDPR-compliant bias auditing with configurable data retention

Related Pages

Comply With Multiple Regulations at Once

OnHirely supports multi-regulation analysis. Run a single audit and get compliance reports for NYC LL144, EU AI Act, and more.

Start Free Audit