Comparison
OnHirely vs. Manual Bias Audits
Compare automated AI bias auditing with OnHirely versus traditional manual consulting audits. See why automated auditing saves time and money.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | OnHirely | Manual Consulting Audit |
|---|---|---|
| Time to complete | Minutes | 4-8 weeks |
| Cost | From €99/month | €15,000-€50,000+ |
| NYC LL144 compliant | ||
| EU AI Act compliant | Varies | |
| Intersectional analysis | Rarely included | |
| Statistical significance testing | ||
| Automated data mapping | ||
| Real-time monitoring | ||
| Unlimited re-audits | ||
| PDF report with SHA-256 hash | Varies | |
| Score distribution analysis | Often extra | |
| Self-service platform |
OnHirely Advantages
Results in minutes, not weeks
Fraction of the cost of consulting engagements
Unlimited re-audits included in subscription
Multi-regulation compliance (LL144, AB 331, EU AI Act)
Automated data column mapping
Cryptographic integrity verification (SHA-256)
Manual Consulting Audit Advantages
Custom analysis tailored to unique situations
Expert testimony available for litigation
May satisfy organizations requiring named auditor
Can include qualitative assessment of hiring process
Our Verdict
For the vast majority of organizations, OnHirely provides faster, cheaper, and more comprehensive bias auditing than manual consulting engagements. Manual audits may still be needed for complex litigation support or organizations requiring a named expert witness.
See OnHirely in Action
Start your free audit and experience the difference.
Start Your Free Audit